|
Works on this Site
|
Title
Click for Text |
Abstract |
Keywords |
Author(s) |
Publication Details |
|
2003-2004 Archaeology Grant Applications: Outline |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
In process |
|
Report on the 2004 Rock Art Society of India Congress, the 10th Congress of the International Federation of Rock Art Organizations |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
International Newsletter on Rock Art 42 (2005), pp. 18-19 |
|
2004-2005 Archaeology Grant Applications: Outline |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
In process |
|
31/12/69 |
|
|
K. J. Sharpe |
Unpublished poem |
|
A Physical Yet Spiritual Basis for Consciousness: From The Neuroscience Of Roger Penrose, or The Neuroscience of Roger Penrose and God’s Interaction with the World |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
A proposal |
|
Agape and Oxytocin. For the JTF conference startoff |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Rebecca Bryant |
|
|
Aim, Method, and Results of the 1976 Expedition |
|
|
Christine E. Sharpe and Kevin J. Sharpe |
An unpublished report |
|
Alexander Marshack, 1918-2004 |
|
|
Leslie Van Gelder and Kevin Sharpe |
To appear in the International Newsletter on Rock Art |
|
Alexander Marshack, 4 April 1918-20 December 2004 |
|
|
Leslie Van Gelder and Kevin Sharpe |
To appear in Rock Art Research |
|
Proposal for All That is Real: A Scientific Vision of the Spiritual Whole |
This book joins the quest for patterns.
Our time has seen a specialization of knowledge with the most
important discoveries remaining obscure to those outside. We thus too easily
lose track of the most elegant and powerful explanatory intuition of all: that
the whole of reality, all our experience, expands from one universal, creative
principle.
This book pursues that dream along the boundaries of modern
science. We explore cosmology, evolution, complexity theory, chaos, and quantum
physics in a manner suitable for lay people as well as for scholars. The focus
always lies upon fundamentals: what do these discoveries mean? The laws
guiding our universe tell us more than simply what happens; they provide the
framework for us to consider our hidden as well as our explicit assumptions
about the world. Ideas don’t stand alone, but lie embedded within a web of
interrelated concepts. Metaphysical truths stand at the center of our webs of
belief, and seismic consequences accompany their alteration.
"The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is its
comprehensibility." Albert Einstein captures our fascination with the laws
of nature, but hints at a deeper project: the study of the laws themselves. Our
challenge is to understand our understanding and hence more adequately
appreciate the significance of our discoveries. Only then can we embed them into
our experience of the world and touch the meaning of reality. |
|
Kevin Sharpe and Jonathan Walgate |
Book proposal. In process |
|
All You Need Is...Oxytocin. For 1996 ESSSAT conference presentation |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
|
|
Altruism after Sociobiology. Loccum 1992. Brief version of EP04 |
|
|
Kevin J. Sharpe |
|
|
The Analysis of Digital Line Markings |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe, Mary Lacombe, and Helen Fawbert |
A proposal |
|
|
|
|
|
Unpublshed adaptation of AR03 for the aborted meander book |
|
An Analysis of Prehistoric Engravings on Boulders in Koonalda Cave, South Australia |
|
|
Christine E. Sharpe and Kevin J. Sharpe |
National Geographic Society Research Reports, 1976 Projects (Washington, DC: National Geographic Society, 1978), pp. 31-50. |
|
The Anthropic Principle: Life in the Universe |
The anthropic principle, that the universe
exists in some sense for life, has
persisted in recent religious and scientific thought because it derives from
cosmological fact. It has been unsuccessful in furthering our understanding of
the world because its advocates tend to impose final metaphysical solutions
onto what is a physical problem.
We begin by outlining the weak and strong versions
of the anthropic principle, and review the discoveries that have led to their
formulation. We present the reasons some have given for ignoring the anthropic
implications of these discoveries, and find these reasons wanting - a real phenomenon
demands real investigation. Theological and scientific solutions of the problem
are then considered and criticized; these solutions provide dead-ends for
explanation.
Finally, we pursue the path that explanation must follow
and look at the physical details of the problem. It seems clear the anthropic
principle has been poorly framed. Removing the ambiguities surrounding the
meaning of “life” may lead to more profitable investigations. |
|
Kevin Sharpe and Jonathan Walgate |
Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 37 (4) December 2002: 929-939 |
|
Applying Zipf, Internal, and Forensic Analyses to Three Panels of Finger Flutings in Rouffignac Cave, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
In process |
|
Aquinas and What God Does |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
|
|
Archaeology Writing Fragment |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
A fragment of an archaeology paper |
|
Archaeology, 'Doing Theology Scientifically,' and the Laws of Life |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
A proposal |
|
Archaeology, Religion, and the Bible |
|
|
Kevin J. Sharpe |
Unpublished |
|
Australian Line Markings |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
A research project proposal |
|
Australian Markings in the Koonalda Style |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
A research project proposal |
|
Australia's Early Writing |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
A proposal |
|
Awakening Dreams |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Presented to the First Roundstone Conversation on Place and Story, Roundstone, Co. Galway, Ireland, 23-27 March 2005 |
|
Bampton Lectures 2001 proposal |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
|
|
Behavioral Genetics: The New Reductionism |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Rebecca Bryant |
Submitted for Publication |
|
Believing in Belief: The Pelican on the Billabong |
The universe is too vast and complex for any one system to encompass it in its entirety. What makes a
belief system "work" is not the accuracy but the efficacy of its tenets for those who believe in it. This essay explores
the mind and matter of belief. |
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Science & Spirit 11:3 (July-August 2000), pp. 14-15 |
|
Between the Idea and the Reality: God in an Age of Science |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Being put on site |
|
|
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
In process |
|
Beyond Complementarity: The 'Ladder' Model for the Integration of Science and Theology |
|
|
Kevin J. Sharpe |
Unpublished |
|
Beyond Donald MacKay's Complementarity for Relating Science and Theology |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
unpublished |
|
Beyond Internal Analysis: What Flutings Can Tell |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
To appear in a Festchrift for Alexander Marshack |
|
Beyond the Beyond |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
|
|
Biology Intersects Religion and Morality |
Morality is only a biological adaptation and hence God doesn't exist. Michael Ruse claims this from his understanding of sociobiology. It is easy to see why many theologians then dismiss the sociobiological analysis of morality. Arthur Peacocke says that, while the spiritual and mental life does have a biological root and must satisfy requirements evolution set up long ago, on top of this people can interpret themselves to themselves at their own level of cultural development. The mental is continuous with and a development from and beyond the biological. Ruse would agree: culture has a role in mediating biological behavior, even if secondary, a role not determined by biology. He would add that the content of much spiritual and mental life arises from biological mechanisms. Ruse and Peacocke reach an impasse.
That God is amoral is another response to Ruse. Morality has nothing to do with God; it has only to do with, and comes from, human beings. Cultures need to discover or work out their morality according to human nature, they need to discern the good biological inclinations from the bad. This constructive development of sociobiological insights then leads to the question: Where can western culture find a morality that people would feel is right? |
Michael Ruse, Arthur Peacocke, science and religion, sociobiology, morality, reductionism, theology |
Kevin J. Sharpe |
Biology and Philosophy 7 (1992): 77-88 |
|
The Biology of Meaning |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Presented to the Fourth Roundstone Conversation, Roundstone, Ireland, 23-27 April 2008 |
|
The Biology of Meaning: Fundamental Desires Driven by the Desire for Happiness |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
In process |
|
The Boulder Engravings in the Upper Chamber of Koonalda Cave, South Australia |
|
|
Christine E. Sharpe and Kevin J. Sharpe |
Unpublished paper, 1980 |
|
Burrow Bickering |
|
|
Kevin J. Sharpe |
Unpublished short story |
|
The Camel |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Unpublished story |
|
Camellias and Happiness: An Integration of Science and Religion |
We propose the camellia
model for the integration of science and religion, in which each accepts the
knowledge of the other, and they together build a flourishing bush of
energetic, inquiring, life-directing, and truthful knowledge. The nature of
happiness provides an example of how this model integrates scientific and
religious knowledge. |
|
Kevin Sharpe and Rebecca Bryant |
Quodlibet 4 (1), Winter 2002. Online at www.Quodlibet.net |
|
Can Spirituality Affect Health? |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Rebecca Bryant |
Science & Spirit 9(3) 1998: 4-5 |
|
Catastrophe Theory |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Notes on CT and theology |
|
Causality and Creation: The Quantum Footprint |
Origins demand explanations. We look back at the beginning of the universe and ask what “caused” the Big Bang?
The anthropic principle posits an intelligent creator; the “many-universes” theory suggests a one-time, wild-change origin
against incalculable odds. But do both sides miss the point? Kevin Sharpe and Jon Walgate explore the ways that quantum physics is
rephrasing the question of origins. |
|
Kevin Sharpe and Jonathan Walgate |
Science & Spirit 10:4 (November-December 1999), pp. 10-11 |
|
Chess and the Real World: Reduce or Emerge? |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Jonathan Walgate |
Science & Spirit
Spirit |
|
Children and Paleolithic 'Art': Indications from Rouffignac Cave, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
International Newsletter on Rock Art 38 (2004), pp. 9-17 |
|
Christian Theology and the Physics, Metaphysics, and Mathematics of David Bohm |
David Bohm's name is often associated with the development of holistic thinking and theory-making within physics. Bohm has
mounted successive and related offenses since the 1950's in particular within quantum theory, but with considerably wider
ramifications for the whole of physics and for our general understanding of reality and epistemology.
A great deal of popular interest in Bohm and the new physics (i.e., the physics of the twentieth century arising out of quantum
theory and the relativity theories) has arisen of late from those with a mystical and Eastern religious perspective; Fritjof
Capra's book The Tao of Physics is a good example. However, much of this interest is impaired with excessive and uncritical
journalistic enthusiasm. Very little critical work on Bohm's ideas has been undertaken from any, let alone a Christian,
perspective. To view this work, follow these links: Title, Contents, and Preliminaries
Abstract Introduction
Chapter 1 Chapter 2
Chapter 3 Chapter 4
Chapter 5 Chapter 6
Bibliography Vita
My intention in this dissertation is to explore the physics of Bohm and his co-workers - whom I have labeled the Birkbeck
School after the college in which Bohm and some of his fellow thinkers hold or have held positions - and to seek some of the
ramifications of this physics for Christian theology. The problem I address is this: Are the metaphysics, physics, and mathematics
of the Birkbeck School of relevance for theology?
The dissertation is in six chapters divided into two parts. Part One is entitled "The Metaphysics, Physics and Mathematics
of Bohm and the Birkbeck School," and Part Two is entitled "Religion and the Metaphysics, Physics, and Mathematics of
Bohm and the Birkbeck School." Together they survey the physical theories of Bohm and reactions to them, examine his
underlying metaphysical and religious beliefs, and attempt to respond to the physics and metaphysics from a theological point of
view.
The first chapter covers "Hidden Variables Theories." Bohm's first attempt at utilizing the concept of the
indivisibility of all material processes is dubbed a hidden variables theory. One can approach this theory from the question of
indeterminacy at the subatomic level: that we cannot, for instance, know with precision the position and momentum of an electron
at any one moment of time. What is the indeterminacy due to? The hidden variables theory suggests that it is due to a temporary
ignorance on the part of us humans. Observed results are in fact determined by variables hidden from us, escaping our observation.
A totally new theoretical structure, Bohm hoped, will arise and restore determinism by demonstrating that apparent randomness at
one level can be described as the statistical averaging of behavior resulting from exact laws at a lower level.
A variety of hidden variables theories have been put forward, Bohm's name having been closely associated with two. The first
saw the light of the publishing day in 1952, and went through the usual procedure of defense and restatement. In this chapter I
explain this proposal, its successors (including the quantum potential theory), criticisms of it (including von Neumann types of
theorems attempting to prove the nonexistence of hidden variables, and its relationship to the usual Copenhagen interpretation of
quantum mechanics), and I explore some of its philosophical consequences.
Chapter Two is entitled "Out of the Classical Order." Much of twentieth century physics represents an interaction
with and a divergence from what is often referred to as classical physics. Bohm is no exception, except that his points or
emphases of divergence are not always those followed by other physicists of this era. The classical order used in physics derives
from the physics of Newton and its philosophical undergirding. The universe is assumed to be resolvable into parts which exist
independent of each other and which move in a vacuum or a void, or, in their idealization, are extensionless particles. They are
able to interact as do the parts of a machine, and are analyzable in terms of the positions of their constituent objects at
successive moments of time.
A cleavage from the classical notion of order came with Einstein's relativity theories. Rather than taking point particles or
quasi-rigid bodies as the primary concepts, relativity suggests that they should be expressed in terms of processes and events.
The total field of the universe is indivisible and primary, particles being approximate abstractions from the total field.
In moving from relativity into the other great arm of modern physics, quantum theory, Bohm finds more holistic concepts. For
instance, Bohm places great significance in the Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen paradox: events that do not interact with each other
and are spatially separated can be correlated in a manner inexplicable causally via effects whose speed of propagation is not
greater than light's, that is, nonlocality is a feature of the universe. Recent experiments are interpreted by Bohm and his
colleagues as upholding this concept. Further, in a series of articles Bohm and Y. Aharanov develop this paradox to the nonlocal
Aharonov-Bohm effect which is claimed to demonstrate clearly the violation of our classical images by quantum-level phenomena.
Another unique characteristic of quantum theory is its espousing of the uncertainty principle.
A difficulty with the present state of physics which provides a motivation for Bohm and his co-workers to seek a new conceptual
base for the subject, is the irreconcilability of quantum theory and relativity. Quantum mechanical ideas themselves, however,
have been more significant in aiding Bohm's development of his ideas. The intention of Chapter Three, "The Implicate Order,"
is to explain his notions of unbroken wholeness, the implicate order, and the holomovement, all interrelated ideas which deny the
presently dominant analyzing of the world into separately and independently existent parts. Bohm describes reality as implicate,
any portion of it involved in any other portion, and any portion containing information on every other portion implicated within
it. Opposed to this is the notion of the explicate order which images reality as comprising wholly independent entities which may
interact with each other. This chapter examines various properties of the holomovement and then returns to some of the physical
matters highlighted in the previous chapter in order to enquire how the holomovement conceptual base might help to explain them.
The last segment of Chapter Three introduces the mathematical models that have been proposed for the holomovement. It remains to
be seen whether the program of the Birkbeck School can be carried through thoroughly, let alone be accepted by the community of
physicists.
The cosmology or metaphysic which Bohm appears to espouse and which undergirds his ideas, promoting his various theories in the
world of physics, is the subject of Chapter Four ("Bohm's Metaphysics and Physics") which also marks the beginning of
Part Two. My approach in the chapter is to isolate three core concepts from which a few perhaps more well-known principles may be
derived. The first core concept is that there is an inexhaustible depth to reality; the second is that reality is inter-related in
its constituents; the third is that of movement, that the whole and any piece of reality is constantly in process, in activity.
Two further concepts which have their roots in the above three can also be isolated from Bohm's writings. I discuss these various
ideas and their possible origin and motivation from within Bohm.
This chapter continues by looking at Bohm's religious beliefs, a further component of his metaphysics. Bohm is heavily
influenced by what can be called Eastern mysticism and his ideas can be incorporated under the heading of the perennial
philosophy. The center of his religious base is the belief that there is a "beyond," something about which nothing can
be said except that it is. The chapter continues with an examination of some recent attempts at paralleling Eastern mysticism and
modern physics, especially that by Capra. I ask if Capra's and Bohm's respective physical theories are indeed influenced by their
religious beliefs, and my conclusion is that they are.
Chapter Five is entitled "Science, Theology, Process Philosophy, and the Holomovement Metaphysic." The preceding
chapter raises the question of the relationship between science and religion. I now explore the relationship, firstly by outlining
two recent categorizations of suggestions as to the relationship, and then by presenting and critiquing the
"complementarity" model for the relationship raised by Donald MacKay. My conclusion with regard to this model is that it
is promising in its intention (to suggest a model for the science-theology relationship in which they both explain in their own
necessary and truthful ways the same given situations) but too incoherent to be of use. I continue by proposing and attempting to
justify another relationship, which I call the "ladder" model. It suggests the following. Imagine a ladder standing
vertically on the ground. Take the ground to be the common reference of science and theology, namely the real world, its contents
and events. In attempting to understand reality we create models and systems of thought, which in the process so intermingle with
our experience as partially to determine it. Each of the scientific and theological systems of thought is a vertical
"pole" of the "ladder." The "rungs" are the commonalities in their knowledge and assumptions, those
things which they both know to be true about reality in general and in the situation under consideration. I am envisaging ideally
one system of knowledge which has both its scientific and theological emphases (arising from different functions), but which are
not able to be separated on content alone.
The two underlying thoughts behind the concept holomovement bring process philosophy immediately to mind; for instance, in
terms of the idea of the whole, process writers often assert that a characteristic of the primary reality is its oneness, its
being an organism which is divided into sub-entities only at the destruction of its full significance and understanding. In the
last section of Chapter Five I approach the process perspective by concentrating on one particular writer, namely Rupert Sheldrake.
He is one of the small number of biologists who shun the mechanistic approach of their peers and opt for an process organicism.
Sheldrake is perhaps unique in suggesting that an organismic model does, in fact, have predictive possibilities which might
distinguish it from the mechanistic approach, and has attempted to show his theory to be true. In this Sheldrake parallels the
early work by Bohm in which he attempted to show that his hidden variables theory could have predictive differences from the
accepted rivals. I do not stand in judgment on Sheldrake's controversial theories, but use his writings as a way of comparing
Bohm's and the process approaches. There would appear to be similarities, as noted above, but there also appear to be
dissimilarities.
The final chapter is entitled "A Commentary on the Birkbeck Metaphysics, Physics, and Mathematics from a Christian
Theological Perspective." Of previous research concerning Bohm and Christian theology, Robert J. Russell's paper, "The
Physics of David Bohm and Its Relevance to Philosophy and Theology" (which appeared in Zygon in 1985), is probably the
most important. I present his ideas and respond to them, concentrating on the suggested possibility that the holomovement is
divine. I believe that this does an injustice to the image that Bohm has of God, that is of God as totally other than the
holomovement.
This image that Bohm has of God is very similar to that which Gordon Kaufman (lying in the Barthian tradition) has in which God
is absolutely transcendent. This God is totally unknowable as it really is. I take Kaufman's theistic position as delineated in
his book, An Essay on Theological Method, outline it and then criticize it. In faulting Bohm's and Kaufman's assumption
that nothing can be said about the "real" God, and in trying to build as I do an alternative epistemological framework,
I am hoping that I am taking cognizance of their insight and yet avoiding the extreme of their position.
Finally, in Appendix 1 (which in turn depends on the mathematics of Appendix 2) I endeavor to develop a mathematical framework
with which to describe the world in both its quantitative and qualitative aspects, and to which the algebraic model for the
essential elements of the holomovement may be applied. That is, I am offering a mathematical language in which Bohm's general
metaphysics may be expressed. Theology could make use of this mathematical metaphysics by posing theories in it which would be
expressed mathematically and yet still be fully "humanistic" and not "mechanical" or "arithmetic";
perhaps the language of mathematics can offer a rich store of concepts for theology to use beyond its usual linguistic ones.
My conclusion is that there are a number of areas in which the metaphysics, physics, and mathematics of the Birkbeck School are
of relevance for theology. |
|
Kevin J. Sharpe |
Boston University Ph.D. Dissertation, 1987 |
|
A Collection of Columns on Science and Religion. CO01-03, 05-11 |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
|
|
Comments on Sleuthing the Divine |
|
|
|
Published in various periodicals |
|
Comments on Stuart Guthrie's "A Cognitive Theory of Religion" |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe Sharpe Sharpe J. Sharpe |
Current Anthropology 21 (1980): 198 |
|
Compatible Group Topologies |
|
|
Kevin J. Sharpe |
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 53 (1975): 149-51 |
|
Compatible Topologies and Continuous Irreducible Representations |
|
|
Kevin J. Sharpe |
Pacific Journal of Mathematics 52 (1974): 227-31 |
|
Computers and Souls |
Each time an update appears for my computer and promises to cut time off my work, I want it. Each new program and computer pushes us beyond the limits we once felt we could never reach. Will we use this technology to help us understand the spiritual; will we allow it to lead us into a different understanding of spiritual matters? |
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Science & Spirit 8(4) Winter 1997: 19 |
|
Concluding Remarks |
Sociobiology makes claims on theology because human genes
condition all aspects of culture, including religion and morality. Thus,
sociobiology's undermining of the belief in, the power behind, and the content
of altruism is unavoidable. Unfortunately, it also undermines biological
altruism. There is a way to rebuild altruism and biological
altruism, and harness power for their support. |
|
Kevin J. Sharpe |
Altruismus: aus der Sicht von Evolutionsbiologie, Philosophie und
Theologie, Loccum Protocols 30/92, ed. Hans May (Rehburg-Loccum,
Germany: Evangelische Akademie, Loccum, 1996), pp.257-260 |
|
Continuous Points in Topological Groups |
|
|
|
unpublished |
|
The Cosmic Blueprint |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
An unpublished paper |
|
Cosmology and Design |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Jonathan Walgate |
Submitted |
|
Cots and the Cosmic Commencement |
What caused the big bang? |
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Science & Spirit 6 (Winter 1995): 8-9 |
|
A Counterexample to the Shamanic Hypothesis regarding Prehistoric Rock Art |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
Submitted for publication |
|
Dating of Human Use of Grotte de Rouffignac, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
In process |
|
David Bohm's Physics and Religion |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
In Science and Theology in Action, ed. Chris Bloore and Peter Donovan (Palmerston North: The Dunmore Press Ltd, 1987), pp. 72-83 |
|
David Bohm's Physics and Spirituality |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
In process |
|
David Bohm's World: New Physics and New Religion |
David Bohm is a controversial
figure in physics. Now retired from Birkbeck College in the University of
London, he started his career as a brilliant and promising physicist at
Princeton University. There he wrote Quantum Theory, a still standard work of
conventional quantum physics. It appeared in 1951.
Since then his
theories have stirred controversy. Most physicists do not accept them. Yet he
wrestles with basic questions raised by contemporary quantum physics and does
not escape it into a world of his own. Rather, he asks questions of the
accepted physics and, using its techniques, tries to solve them. One of his
principle drives is to clarify the idea of connectedness; he believes every
thing connects with everything else. He finds it at the heart of quantum
physics as it expresses it with the term nonlocality.
This book will
point out what of Bohm's work is influential in main-line physics and what is
considered fringe. It describes his various physical theories and continuing
research interest in ideas he has played a major part in developing. I conclude
that, while he has contributed a great deal of importance, the status of his
hidden variables theory (the quantum potential theory) and his holomovement
theory remains questionable. I do not believe the physics community will move
significantly toward accepting them without their proving empirically superior
to the conventional approach to quantum mechanics. I also separate his physics
from those metaphysical popularizations of his ideas which appear to
misinterpret them.
Hidden variables
theories are one of the ways Bohm tries to understand and explain such quantum
phenomena as nonlocality. Another is his holomovement or implicate order ideas.
These center on the notion of unbroken wholeness. They deny the dominant
picture of the world as made up of separate and independent parts.
The metaphysical
beliefs which Bohm holds lie under as well as inspire his physics. I describe
this metaphysical base, including the beliefs which could be called religious.
Since Bohm is often
associated with Rupert Sheldrake and his theories of morphogenetic forms, I
compare the thinking of the two. Sheldrake's ideas have their roots in the
process philosophy of A. N. Whitehead, whereas Bohm's, while similar, addresses
more fundamental questions.
I suggest Bohm is
using his religion in his physics. Fritjof Capra is trying to do this by
introducing and upholding the bootstrap theory because it is close to his
Eastern mystical views. Both Bohm and Capra use their religion in their physics
in two ways. One is to take the theories and concepts of religion as hypotheses
for physics. The other is that their religious convictions also provide the
motivation to pursue the physical theories and hypotheses.
The final chapter
explores the relation between Bohm's holomovement metaphysics and theology. It
examines the relation between science and theology in general, and the
reactions of theologians to Bohm's work. There is one error often made in such
evaluations, having to do with the way God's relation to the world is
conceived. In conclusion I point out that Bohm's metaphysics has the potential
for being developed into a theology.
Click Buy It and you will be taken directly
to an order form for this book at Amazon.com. This does not oblige you to buy the book but it will be an easy step from here to do
so. |
|
Kevin J. Sharpe |
Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1993 |
|
Dawkins Damn Well Right |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
In process |
|
Determining Our Future: Quantum Solutions to the Problem of Free Will |
Any account of free will that takes the
laws of nature seriously must begin by assuming that “making a free choice” is
a process these laws might describe. As entities within the physical world, we
make our contribution, as part of the whole of physical reality, towards
determining the future. The question then becomes “What kind of natural process
is a free choice?” which in turn begs the question “What does a natural process
look like?” A classical choice was thought for centuries to be predictable,
until chaos theory showed that it only looked predictable with hindsight.
Quantum mechanics has changed even that. Holistic choices are manifestations of
our infinite and unknowable connections with the whole of reality. Impossible
to foresee, we admit, looking back at them, that we could have chosen
differently. Sprung from the most counter intuitive physics, these choices are
free in the most intuitive sense. |
|
Kevin Sharpe and Jonathan Walgate |
Presented to the Science & Medical Network, Green College, Oxford University, England, 3 November 1998 |
|
Dialogue with the Silent Rock |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and TonyVan Witsen |
A TV documentary poposal |
|
Directions for Writing, Field and Laboratory Research on Line Markings |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
In Process |
|
Russell and the subuniverse |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
|
|
A Divine Nonlocal Universe |
With nonlocality, the Universe Divine unites everything into a whole and is conscious. This consciousness comes from the physical and not another realm. |
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Science & Religion News 5 (Winter 1994): 7 |
|
The Divine Nonlocal Universe |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
The Network 13 (Summer 1996): 28-29 |
|
Divine Projections |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Presented at the Conference of The Highlands Institute of American Religious and Philosophical Thought, 22-25 June 2005. |
|
Downward Causation Models: God's Interaction with the World |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Book outline |
|
Dreaming Time |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
|
|
Dreaming Time. Chapter 2 |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
|
|
Dreaming Time. Proposal |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
|
|
Dreaming Time. Query |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Proposed conference presentation |
|
Editorial |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
IRAS Newsletter 39:1 (1990), p. 4 |
|
Editorial |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
IRAS Newsletter 38:3 (15 April 1990), p. 1 |
|
Editorial |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
IRAS Newsletter 38:2 (15 January 1990), p. 1 |
|
Editorial |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Science & Religion News 1:1 (Spring 1990), p. 1 |
|
Editorial |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Science & Religion News 1:2 (Summer 1990), p. 11 |
|
Editorial: Kevin's Corner |
|
|
Kevin J. Sharpe |
IRAS Newsletter 36:2 (15 April 1988), pp. 1-3 |
|
Editorial: Kevin's Corner |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
IRAS Newsletter 38:1 (1989), p. 2 |
|
Editorial: Kevin's Corner |
|
|
|
IRAS Newsletter 37:2 (1989), p. 2 |
|
Editorial: Kevin's Corner |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
IRAS Newsletter 37:1 (1988), p.3 |
|
The Emergent Order |
We examine the phenomenon of emergence,
referring particularly to Arthur Peacocke’s ideas of an emergent spiritual
order. He believes that the whole of an emergent structure causes its
parts to cohere and that emergent structures (including minds and persons) are
fundamental to reality. He thereby hopes to remove the reductionist challenge
that seeks to understand a whole fully in terms of its parts.
We argue that emergent phenomena are not causally active in the
above sense. The holistic completeness of these structures at their own
theoretical level does not substitute for the causal independence Peacocke
requires. Some computer simulations that generate emergent complexity follow
simple and self-contained sets of rules. Peacocke also adheres to a hierarchical
account of reality: "a series of levels of organization of matter,"
running from atoms through molecules to cells and eventually to whole
ecosystems. But causal behavior does not respect this ordering. Further,
Peacocke’s opposition to reductionism is unnecessary; any
"completeness" of lower-level models does not imply the redundancy of
higher-level descriptions.
Emergence transforms reductionism into a constructive and
positive principle. |
Arthur Peacocke, chaos, divine-universe interaction,
downward causation, emergence, hierarchies of levels, holism, Nancey Murphy,
reductionism, scientific models, self-organizing criticality, supervenience,
whole-part constraints |
Kevin Sharpe and Jonathan Walgate |
Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 38 (2) June 2003: 411-433 |
|
The Emergent Order: Cause or Effect? |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Jonathan Walgate |
A conference paper proposal |
|
The Empirical Approaches to Happiness and their Challenges to Theology |
Genes and circumstances equally contribute to a person’s happiness at any moment, but genes cause about eighty percent of the range of happiness they can feel. Genes do this by setting the production and release of the neurotransmitter dopamine, and the neurotransmitter serotonin to create the feeling of misery. The scientific story continues. Evolutionary psychologists have mapped the evolutionary means by which these genes arose, and social psychologists suggest that happiness largely depends on feeling meaning in life. This presentation explores such matters and relates them to the idea of God as the source of human meaning and happiness. |
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Unaccepted submission for a conference presentation |
|
An Empiricist Challenge to Theological Method: Gordon Kaufman's and David Tracy's Proposals with Reference to the Skepticism of Kai Nielsen |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
A proposal |
|
Environment, Meaning, and Happiness: From Science to Theology |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
|
|
Environmental Ethics and David Bohm's Implicate Order |
|
|
Kevin J. Sharpe |
Unaccepted proposal for a conference presentation |
|
Epistemythology: a comment by Daniel Noel |
|
|
Daniel Noel |
|
|
Ethics and Values: Black and White, or Grays? |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Three Presentations in the St Paul's Church Adult Education Program, Concord,
New Hampshire, 1-15 December 1991 |
|
Evidence for Cave Marking by Paleolithic Children |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
To appear in Antiquity |
|
Expedition to Koonalda Cave, January 1976 |
|
|
Graeme L. Pretty |
Unpublished report |
|
An Experimental Technique for Examining Prehistoric Finger Markings in Caves |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Mary Lacombe |
A proposal |
|
Explaining the Origin |
Origins demand explanations. We look back at the beginning of the universe and ask what “caused” the Big Bang?
The anthropic principle posits an intelligent creator; the “many-universes” theory suggests a one-time, wild-change origin
against incalculable odds. But do both sides miss the point? Kevin Sharpe and Jon Walgate explore the ways that quantum physics is
rephrasing the question of origins. |
|
Kevin Sharpe and Jonathan Walgate |
Presented to the Science and Religion Forum Annual Meeting, Human Significance and Modern Cosmology, Durham, England, 9-11 September 1999 |
|
Grant letter for funding from Bill Gates |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe |
A research project proposal |
|
An Externalism in Order to Communicate |
Sandor Gallus highlighted the significance of the line markings in Koonalda Cave in 1956. Further examples, in caves throughout southern Australia, have led to a reassessment of Gallus’s suggestion that the lines, dated to the late Pleistocene, were a means of communication – a hypothesis that contravened established opinion. Using the hypothesis of Gallus as a starting point, we describe our hypothesis, experimental method, and results. We suggest that the lines are a mnemonic notation system and, by their artificial reproduction, we will pose questions regarding form, technique, and structural consistencies that will help to elucidate their meaning. |
Gallus - Communication – Finger flutings – Mnemonic – Notation |
Kevin Sharpe, Mary Lacombe, and Helen Fawbert |
The Artefact 21 (1998): 95-104 |
|
Finding Time: The Elusive Unit of Existence |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Rebecca Bryant |
Science & Spirit 9(2) 1998: 2-3, 24-25 |
|
Finger Fluting Styles in Grotte de Rouffignac, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
In process |
|
Finger Flutings and the Evolution of Language and Cognition |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
Unpresented proposal for a conference presentation. |
|
Finger Flutings in Chamber A1 of Rouffignac Cave, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
In process |
|
Finger Flutings in Gargas Cave, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
Presented to the Eleventh Congress of the International Federation of Rock Art Organizations, Lisbon, Portugal, 4-9 September 2006 |
|
Finger Flutings in Rouffignac and Gargas Caves, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate College, Union Institute & University, Cincinnati, Ohio. 22 January 2005 |
|
Finger Flutings in Rouffignac and Gargas Caves, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
Proposed |
|
The Finger Flutings of Chamber A2, Rouffignac Cave, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
In process |
|
Finger Flutings in Gargas Cave, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
In process |
|
The Finger Flutings of Rouffignac and Gargas Caves, France |
This paper uses an empirical methodology to examine finger flutings in Rouffignac and Gargas Caves, France, asking what they might reasonably tell about the people who made them. Flutings can be divided into four forms, Mirian, Rugolean, Evelynian, and Kirian.
An initial result for a chamber of Mirian flutings from Rouffignac Cave is that many of the flutings were probably made by young children held aloft to touch the ceiling. Those holding the children were at times not only walking, but moving rotationally from their hips, perhaps in whole body movement. This may be the first demonstrated case of Paleolithic cave ‘art’ made by children. The number of people involved in fluting in this chamber can be ascertained, the shapes they preferred to create can be cataloged, and previous interpretations of the flutings can be challenged.
An initial result for two clusters of Rugolean flutings in Rouffignac Cave indicates the ages, heights, genders, and number of fluters involved. Further, the application of Zipf’s Law from communications theory, based on the number of fingers used in each unit of a cluster, suggests that these flutings were a form of inter-subject communication.
An initial result for a panel of Kirian flutings in Rouffignac Cave is that the vertical flutings appear in sets of approximately seven or fourteen; they were probably made right to left; that stick scoring and clay reapplication were involved; and that several shapes repeat across the clusters in this form.
Initial results from several clusters of flutings from Gargas also suggest the role of children in the fluting of Mirian lines and the inappropriateness of many previous interpretations of the flutings. The differences and similarities between flutings found in Gargas and those researched in Rouffignac are instructive.
Applying similar methodologies to the flutings found in other areas of these two caves and elsewhere may further elucidate the behaviors behind their manufacture. |
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
Presented at the Tenth Congress of the International Federation of Rock Art Organizations and the Rock Art Society of India 2004 Congress, Agra, India, 1 December 2004. |
|
Finger Markings in Caves: Further Research Results |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe, Mary Lacombe, and Helen Fawbert |
A proposal |
|
Finger Markings in Caves: Further Research Results |
In this paper, we propose to extend the
application of the results from previous experiments to define constraining and
explanatory parameters for finger markings. Our methodology of replication and
internal analysis of finger markings had restrictions imposed by our previous
choice of medium - plaster of Paris. The weight of the plaster limited the
surface area on which we were able to work. Our new method will further many of
our original ideas, on a larger scale. This will enable us to replicate the
markings on an area similar in size to those in caves. The flexibility of the
new medium - finger paint - will allow us to not only expand upon our previous
research results in plaster of Paris, but encourage experiments with new ideas
that may arise from using a larger upright surface. We will videotape this
activity and make notes on our reactions and findings. We will focus our
experiments towards attempting to see direction of movement.
Our experiments on a smaller
scale, using plaster of Paris, will further our previous work in an attempt to
support conclusions reached during recent fieldwork in southern France. We will
concentrate on the possibility of defining handedness and starting points of
lines. We suggest that these observations will enable us to formulate further
questions. The use of a specific hand to make a specific number of lines, for
example, may have positive implications for our theory of a mnemonic notation
system. Systematic consistencies indicate a defined activity, as opposed to
random activity. We hope that this will further elucidate the meanings of the
finger markings. |
|
Kevin Sharpe, Mary Lacombe, and Helen Fawbert |
Presented to the International Rock Art Conference, Vila Real, Portugal, 6-12 September 1998 |
|
Flipping from Genetics |
I raise a study in behavioral genetics that raises several wider questions. Are the violent men of a particular family in the Netherlands prone to a genetic abnormality responsible for their violence? Should the Dutch courts have held the rapist family member fully responsible for his actions, tried him for them, and sentenced him to the maximum term the law provides? Genetics leads to the lens, following Minnie Bruce Pratt’s image of interdisciplinarity, of legal studies, then to that of philosophy, moral studies, theology, and so on. |
|
Kevin Sharpe |
Network: Issues and Ideas 16(1) Fall 1999: 32-34 |
|
The Floor of the Fluted Subchamber, Chamber A1, Rouffignac Cave, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
In process |
|
The Flow of Time: Scientific and Theological Perspectives |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Jonathan Walgate |
A version to appear in Philosophy and Theology. Presented to the C. S. Lewis Oxbridge Conference, 2002 |
|
The Flow of Time: Scientific Perspectives |
Time flows. This oft-lamented fact of human
existence seems plain enough, but is remarkably difficult to explain
scientifically. Physical theory follows a greater goal – symmetry – and the
directional nature of time is left adrift. The phenomenon must nevertheless be
explained.
Scientists
have searched classical mechanics for answers since Newton, but precious little
progress has been made on his mystical ideas. The discoveries of
thermodynamics, though clearly relevant, have posed more problems than they
have solved.
Now a new
solution presents itself through quantum mechanics. The intimate relation
between thermodynamics and time is not in doubt, but now quantum theory is
explaining how the laws of entropy arise from a stranger reality. The theory of
decoherence begins to explain time as a holistic quantum concept.
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Jonathan Walgate |
Philosophy and Theology 13 (2) 2001: 311-332. Presented to the Center for Research in Science conference, Asuza Pacific University, Asuza, California, 1999. |
|
Fluted Animals in the Zone of Crevices, Gargas Cave, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
To appear in the Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the International Federation of Rock Art Organizations, Lisbon, Portugal, 4-9 September 2006 |
|
Fluted Severines to Fluted Animals to Engraved and Crayoned Animals |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
In process |
|
Fluting Methodology |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
In process |
|
Four Forms of Finger Flutings as Seen in Rouffignac Cave, France |
|
|
Kevin Sharpe and Leslie Van Gelder |
Submitted for publication |
|
Freedom and Free Will, or Tyranny? Part 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|